| This
1st
charge (>>>
No. 2) dated Feb.
28th 2002
(in German)
is now with us. Only little surprise that the DA expands
the proceedings against all homepages on concerned server with
the much too sweeping accusation «to
have links to other internet homepages, particularly to ssi-media.com»!!!
And
that was not all: Additionally the DA calls the operators to
account for other sites, for which they're not responsible
and to which there exist no links, f.e.
geocities.com/nekromantik75
- only with the explanation, that there would be "a reference
to the movie "Blutgeil" [...] and to a lot of other brutal films!!!!!
Plus
the all topping accusation, that there would be «displayed
information [
]
about the criminal proceedings»
against the movie "Blutgeil"!!!!!
This quite clearly illustrates what's it
all about for the public prosecution: to muzzle the operators
because of critical expression of opinion and unpleasant reporting.
To spell it out: justice
motivated by political convictions.
International
witchhunt against critical
sites
Another relevant
indication in this direction is according to legal files the
lot of official authorities (beside public prosecution and
district attorney) being involved in this newly «pilot
case»
against www.blutgeil.com:
-
Institute for journalism (IPMZ), university of Zurich (File
1 in German)
-
Criminal Department of
the state of Bavaria,
BRD (File
2
in German)
-
Interpol Wiesbaden, BRD (File
3 in German)
-
Federal Police Department,
Bern (File
4 in German)
-
Cantonal police Zurich,
special task force 2 «sex crimes» (File
5 in German)
-
Cantonal police Zurich,
criminal authority district 2 (interrogation
in German)
It's the last straw
that the operators are once more officially filed as «terrorists»
being connected with critical police reporting (a.o. about
injuries of "teargas" on PigBrother.info).
But one after
another:
Institute
for journalism of university Zurich:
Home of applied
denunciation
Head of institute
for journalism and media-science Prof. Bonfadelli is
well known for regularly calling for «measure»
against «violent
videogames»
with the explanation, that «a
connection between the consumption of violent games»
and «the
use of violence in the real world»
is «a
scientifically proven fact»
- knowing how to give the (wrong) impression, that the «found
out connection»
would be the one between cause and effect. Less known is the
fact that the active professor uses to call for denunciation
among friends and on the quiet. The pilot case against www.blutgeil.com
reveals for the first time such a «private»
campaign during lectures and with means of the university.
Assistant
Jochen Hoffmann being put forward as a front man (j.hoffmann@ipmz.unizh.ch)
reported his accusations to the criminal authorities of the
state of Bavaria as a precaution hopeing to hush up the sender's
address. Unfortunately his mails were filed including the
header giving proof of using the official university
server rzumail2.unizh.ch to do his denunciations during office
hours (09:46). Another racy detail: reason of the denunciation
was not so called "portrayal of violence" but explicitly
the critical reports about police brutality on www.blutgeil.com
- in Hoffmann's jargon: «smear
campaign against the state and particularly against the police
[
].
I would be grateful to you - by informing responsible colleagues
in other countries - for doing everything possible to erase
these pages out of the internet and to call the responsibles
to account.»
(Emphasizes by SSI)
Police officers
and DA think the same
Matter of honour
that the criminal authorities of the state of Bavaria
in cooperation with Interpol Wiesbaden were very generous
in starting immediately extensive investigations with the
result (without nameing further reasons), that not only
blutgeil.com,
but also the documentation about the airport-prison Art
in Jail (english
version available)
as well as the literature-site slowgrind.com
(only in German) are «gloryfing
violence».
Also matter of honour that Swiss state police authority as
well as cantonal police Zurich and DA Wehrli (at public prosecution's
behest) adopt this opinion without questioning and conjure
legal proceedings up out of nothing against unpleasant site
operators in record time.
Rejection
of Charge No. 1
March
12th 2002, Judge Guggenbühl rejects the charge as "not
clear enough" and demands formal stopping against
ART
IN JAIL and slowgrind.com.
Despite slowgrind.com being a purely text page and
art. 135 explicitely excluding textpublications, the
district attorney extensively snoops around on our
«literature pages», underlining once more the
purely political motivation of his preceedings.
Proceeding
#2: «Illegal Portrayal of Policemen»
Meanwhile,
PigBrother.info-Reporter
Anger gets arrested violently after filming a plain
clothes officer provoking with an empty bottle during
a manifestation on May 1st 2002. Journalist / cameraman
/ photographer Anger, in the local policecorps only too well
known for his work depicting e.g. the puking officer having
inhaled some of his own «teargas» (see
loop, click to enlarge),
is taken into custody under the charge of «illegal portrayal
of officers» the favourite
excuse for harrassing members of the press during the
last 20 years, illegaly confisating and «accidentally
destroying» films and tapes and gravely beating
unliked photographers, although there actually doesn't
exist such a law which prohibits taking pictures of policemen.
Unfortunately for the police, after years and years of legal
struggle, concluding in a case won before federal court by
media-union comedia, just
this spring 2002 police had finally to admit this fact.
So this 1st accusation was silently dumped, the new
accusation being "hindering officers from official
duty" a tried and tested "offence
of embarrassment": Whenever police can't blame the
arrested for nothing, but despite won't let him free, a (false)
statement of an officer (or two) is sufficient to zurich
courts for conviction. Additionally, the authorities refuse
to give the illegaly confiscated videotape back
but instead hand it out to the Political Police!
>>> detailed report on the arrest with
additional pics
«Illegal
Publication / Advertisement»: Charge
No. 2
After
a 3rd interrogation on June 4th 2002, DA Wehrli issues Charge
No. 2 dated June 17th 2002. Instead of clarifying the
critisised plainly groundless to totally
absurd accusasions, he simply adds another: Since
the accused appeared at occasion of an interview in a local
newspaper wearing a blutgeil.com-hooded-shirt,
now he should additionally be sentenced for «advertising
of a forbidden film»!!! So much for freedom of speech
in Switzerland ...
>>>
Continue
List
of files (in
German)
Charge
No. 1 (in German)
Charge
No. 2 (in German)
|