Zurich: Citypolice deliberately lies
to District Council and public!
least 11 people lost
by "rubber bullets" in Zurich since 1980, 2 alone winter
2003/2004; countless persons suffered fractures,
deep flesh wounds,
aso. Even apparently light eyedamages
are being threatened by long-term
until 10 years (!!) after the acute trauma (cataract
In the eyes of responsibles:
"Not as bad as all that"
Society of concerned parents
inside Police encircle Eye shot out!
She wanted to get herself to safety
"hands up" from "teargas"
on the same occasion, an other woman suffered
a finger fracture from
in front of national historicalmuseum, 31st January 1980
more police atrocities
only Police extoling their "battle weapons" as "harmless"
and "forgetting" to report injuries
eye-damage of 27.1.01
"in the heat of the battle"
(see Fax Press
Dept. Citypolice 29.1.01 to AL-District Councelor Niklaus Scherr).
Head of Press Dept. Citypolice himself "emphasized"
(!!!) "not having knowledge of someone being
hurt by Police forces or having lost eyesight from a rubber bullet"
nobody will notice, and if, then he/she won't be able to read on
that eye anyway, hahaha.
Switzerland, "rubberbullets" are shot in packages
of 35 pieces. Depending on the distance, impact force and
scattering (and therefore injuries)
vary. According to the police, maximum range is about 50 m,
stipulated «minimal distance» is 20 m.
on type of bullets, such a "bundle" weights ca.
315-630 g. (Here
bullets of 18 g each, ca. 1982)
Examination Commissions of District Council not always get to know
the whole truth:
Against description of Citypolice not only the convenient app. 9.5 - 11
gram "rubber bullets"
are in use,
but also a variation with double weight (and danger)!
What material are they really out of? It is not rubber!
and flesh above the bone cleary penetrated,
long edge of hitting bullet easily to be recognised.
stroke of luck:
Only a few millimeters more above, and instead of the
bloody fleshwound, the bullet would have irreveribly
destroyed another eye.
Police usually lies about weight, material
and dangerousness of actual used "battle weapons".
Nov. 28th 2001 the police again reported totally
false figures, depicting «rubber bullets» as «harmless»
and «physically unable to penetrate human skin».
When PigBrother complained about the obviously glossed over
figures by a «federal ballistic expert», he called
it a «arithmetical fault». >>>
Report in german with photos of injuries by british rubber/plastic-bullets
picture: Soceiety of Concerned Parents
not in the eye
but a scar
for a lifetime anyway.
noone else noticed the convienient lie (excuse me: «arithmetical
fault») anyway, and whatever:
Who loses eyesight from "rubber bullets" is not a "law
abiding citizen", buta
"subhuman creature" and it is "your own fault"
and Police «doesn't know» of any injuries and lost of
doesn't want to hear, must feel!»
when it is
proceedings against fallible
officers not following rules
of stipulated "minimal distance" of 20 meters when
using "rubber bullets",
in one only case it came to a charge, let alone to a trial or to
a conviction within the last 20 years would
be too much!
A n o t h e r
c l e a r c a s e
o f " s e l f - d e f e n s e " !
near-distance-shot against senior woman!!
protected her face with her hands -- the results:
lost eye, but additional injuries on fingers. The
left middlefinger is broken.
bullet hit the left ear. Amongst others fleshwound
at the cheekbone.
only institution in Zurich the "Society of Concerned Parents"
came out against the use of "rubber bullets". But the
try to abolish them again at least in the city of Zurich on democratic
ways by an Initiative failed in 1981.
In Winter 2002/2003, only the swiss Youth Parliament voted again
to abolisch «rubberbullets» and «teargas».
picture: Society of Concerned Parents
shooting distance can be found
out later from the scatter of the wounds / scars. (Here about
2 more eyes shot were out again. Police since as usual «unable
to determine who exactly shot» therefore «no
trial possible, sorry» .